Check PointCheck Point runs your network, your cloud and your people on one policy, enforced the same everywhere.

Policy written once
  • Network security from perimeter to segment
  • Cloud workloads and the configuration behind them
  • Protection that follows the user, not the office

Three estates, or one

Network security

Firewalls, segmentation and remote access run as part of one estate rather than as three products that must be talked into agreeing.

Cloud workloads

The same policy applied to what runs in the cloud, including the configuration mistakes that are the usual way in.

The people using it

Protection that follows the user rather than the office, which is where the perimeter went.

One policy, and the places it has to hold

The branch that got its own firewall
Bought in a hurry by whoever was on site and never compared against head office. It is one estate or a list of exceptions, and the second is discovered during an incident.
The lift-and-shift
A workload moved to the cloud keeps the ruleset it had in the rack. The perimeter around that rack is not there, and somebody else finds the gap.
The contractor’s laptop
Not your build, not your patch cycle, and on your network by Tuesday. Access decided by the user and the state of the device, not by the cable.
The exception nobody removed
Opened for a migration in March, still open in November because whoever asked has left. One policy means one place to find it and one place to answer for it.
The audit
Somebody asks what the rule is for remote access to production. Three estates, three answers and a week of work. One estate, one screen.
The new office
The question is how long until it is protected like the rest. The policy exists, applying it is what remains. That is the difference between an estate and a collection.

The four names on the quote

The network

Quantum

The gateways, and the policy that runs on them.

  • Firewalls at the perimeter and between segments
  • Remote access for staff who are not in an office
  • Intrusion prevention on the traffic that gets through
  • The devices on the network that cannot run an agent
The cloud

CloudGuard

The same policy, where there is no perimeter to put it on.

  • Network security inside your cloud accounts
  • Posture: the configuration mistakes that are the usual way in
  • Workload and container protection at runtime
  • Application and API protection in front of what you publish
The people

Harmony

Protection that travels with the user rather than the building.

  • Endpoint protection and response on the laptop
  • Email and collaboration, which is still the way in
  • The browser, where the working day actually happens
  • Mobile devices under the same policy as everything else
All three at once

Infinity

One console, one threat picture, one place the policy is written.

  • A single policy across network, cloud and users
  • Shared threat intelligence, so a block in one place is a block everywhere
  • Correlated detection and response across all of it
  • The reporting somebody asks you for during an audit

We get asked

We already have a firewall. Why change?
The question is not the box. It is whether one policy holds across the network, the cloud and your people. Most estates have three that quietly disagree.
Do we have to replace everything at once?
No, and the ones that tried are the cautionary tales. It goes in where the disagreement costs most, and the rest follows at the pace your renewals allow.
Who runs it once it is in?
We do, if you want that. A licence is not a deployment and a deployment is not an operation. Our analysts watch it and answer when something goes wrong.

Talk to us about Check Point

Bring what you run today and we will map where the policy currently disagrees with itself.